Experts(in this case, math teachers), would have to evaluate the content validity by comparing the test to the learning objectives. of each question, analyzing whether each one covers the aspects that the test was designed to cover.Ī 4th grade math test would have high content validity if it covered all the skills taught in that grade. Assessing content validity is more systematic and relies on expert evaluation. Methods of estimating reliability and validity are usually split up into different types. Validity is harder to assess, but it can be estimated by comparing the results to other relevant data or theory. On the other hand, content validity evaluates how well a test represents all the aspects of a topic. Reliability can be estimated by comparing different versions of the same measurement. When a test has strong face validity, anyone would agree that the test’s questions appear to measure what they are intended to measure.įor example, looking at a 4th grade math test consisting of problems in which students have to add and multiply, most people would agree that it has strong face validity (i.e., it looks like a math test). : the quality or state of being reliable. The difference is that face validity is subjective, and assesses content at surface level. Face validity and content validity are similar in that they both evaluate how suitable the content of a test is.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |